🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media originating from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the country’s government ministers requests measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The company is attempting amendments to a pending law that include lowering the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“If I was a politician, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated the anti-tobacco campaigner.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

The campaigner stated the letter was understood to have been copied to various ministerial offices and was in circulating through community advocacy networks.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. Last month, international health experts sounded an alarm that the smoking product companies was intensifying efforts to undermine international regulations.

“Evidence exists of industry lobbying worldwide. Corporate signatures are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN international gathering,” commented the corporate monitoring director.

Likely impacts

“When public health regulation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the price could be paid in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and requiring that pictorial cautions cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Through correspondence, BAT suggests this be lowered to less than half “according to global recommended threshold”, deferred for no less than one year after the law is enacted.

International experts in fact recommends a alert needs to encompass at least fifty percent of the product container front “and aim to cover as much of the principal display areas as possible”. In the UK, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a packet’s front and back.

Flavored tobacco discussion

BAT asks for the removal of broad restrictions on scented smoking items, claiming that it would lead smokers to “illicitly sold” products. The corporation recommends banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for different infractions “varying from a portion of yearly revenue to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

Through correspondence, the managing director of the African subsidiary claims the company is dedicated to good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the associated health impact” but claims that “some regulations can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Activist reaction

Chimbala said the company's suggested modifications would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that many such provisions operated within the UK, where the corporation is based, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We live in a global village. When I cultivate smoking products in my property and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to profit individually and all the generations of my children while my neighbor's family are perishing … is in itself complete moral collapse.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had not caused companies to close, the advocate mentioned. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

A BAT Zambia spokesperson commented: “BAT Zambia conducts its business in compliance with relevant national regulations. Additionally, the corporation engages in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which provide for stakeholder participation in regulation development.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, mentioning that underage people should be shielded from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We support progressive regulation to achieve intended public health goals, while accepting the variety of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, adding that the company's suggestions “mirror the circumstances of the local commercial environment and smoking product business, which includes rising levels of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was solicited for statement.